Loading
Mainstream guest posts and link insertions on a first-party portfolio. Real metrics, negotiable prices.
Our sites in this niche
Nothing is listed under this niche yet. Tell us what you are after and we will say whether the portfolio can cover it.
Not everything we own is a restricted niche. Tech, health, travel, home, legal and education sites sit in the portfolio alongside the harder verticals, and they work the same way: browse, request or make an offer, agree a price, we publish.
The owner-not-broker argument does not stop mattering because the vertical is uncontroversial. A broker's inventory is a list of publishers who agreed to something once. Ours is a list of sites we run, so the editorial standard, the outbound link policy and the decision to keep a post up are ours to make. When a placement needs fixing, there is nobody to chase.
A guest post is a new article. A link insertion — a niche edit — puts your link into an article that already exists on the site, rather than one written around your link.
The choice comes down to what you are linking to. A product page or a local service page is often served better by an insertion into an article that already covers the subject. A new concept or a launch tends to justify a post, where you get the whole page to make the case.
The constraints are per-site and on the listing: maximum links per post, minimum word count, turnaround days and guarantee window, all shown before you order.
Rankings. Nobody can promise those honestly. What we promise is a placement on a site whose numbers you can see, a live URL, and monitoring through the guarantee window.
What we do check is that the placement is real. After publication we verify that the published URL sits on the site's own domain, returns HTTP 200, is not noindexed, and has a canonical that is absent or self-referential, and that it links to your target URL with your anchor text and a rel no stronger than what was sold. We re-check at one day and again at seven. If a link comes down inside the guarantee window we restore it or place an equivalent one on the same domain within a set number of days.
In a restricted vertical you take relevance where you can find it. Outside one, you have no excuse. Where more than one site could carry a placement, the question changes from "will anyone take this" to "which of these actually makes sense".
Pick on topic first and metrics second. A site whose existing articles already sit next to your subject gives the link a context a reader can follow; a stronger site where your post would be the only page of its kind does not. Domain rating, organic traffic, referring domains and spam score sort the shortlist you built on relevance; they do not build it for you.
The brief is where most of the quality is decided. You set the target URL and the anchor text, and the anchor is validated for length, URLs and spam patterns. Beyond that, tell us what the page you are linking to is for and who would click through to it.
Useful things to put in a brief:
Content can be written by us or supplied by you, subject to the site's minimum word count. Either way the test is the same: the article should stand up for the site's own readers, with the link as one supported reference rather than the reason the page exists. An article that only makes sense as a link vehicle is not one we want to keep on a site we run.